'Making available' equals copyright infringement Print E-mail
Written by Felix Da Silva (fdasilva@bitnip.com)   
Tuesday, 28 August 2007
musicnotemusic_140x140.jpgA judge ruled in the case of Atlantic v. Howell file sharing lawsuit that "making available" of copyrighted works using peer-to-peer software such as Kazaa constitutes as copyright infringement.

Copyright owners have the exclusive rights to distribute or license their works,  the key here is whether sharing a song or making it available in a P2P folder is the same thing as distributing it.

The RIAA's monitoring partner, MediaSentry, submitted screenshots showing that the Howells shared 54 copyrighted songs and Howell admitted under deposition that they came from his CDs.  However, he claimed MediaSentry's screenshot didn't prove anyone downloaded the songs or that he knowingly shared them.

The Howells in this case also argued that their file-sharing program was "not set up to share" and that the files found by Media Sentry were "for private use" and "for transfer to portable devices, that is legal for 'fair use.'

The judge disagreed, writing in an Order (PDF) granting Atlantic's Motion for Summary Judgment, "It is no defense that a Kazaa user did not directly oversee the unauthorized distribution of copyrighted material."


The judge awarded Atlantic Records $40,500, or $750 per song.



Related items:


Canada rejects 'iPod' tax for a second time
MPAA and others call for new anti-piracy laws
Target missed the bulls-eye
LV wins trademark lawsuit against Britney Spears
Penguin audiobooks to be free of copyright protection




Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Google!Facebook!Slashdot!Netscape!Technorati!StumbleUpon!Newsvine!Furl!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!